Ultimate Traffic 2

Duley escreveu:não me "arrisco" por enquanto.

QUOTE (Phantoms @ May 28 2009, 03:29 AM) *
And since it was brought up above, does it include Military flights?


Regarding airports and this also applies to GA and Military flights.

UT2 does not include FSX AFD files to change airport parking, to add more parking to airports. FSX already had sufficient parking for most commercial airports.

That means some airports which have GA traffic in MTX will not have traffic in UT.

There is no military traffic because almost none of the military base airports in FSX have parking. Most to not even have taxiways and ramps.

QUOTE (Phantoms @ May 28 2009, 03:29 AM) *
Does it use FSX flightplans (BGLs) as apposed to the FS9 style BGLs carried over from FS9 days?


UT2 does not use traffic.bgl files of any fromat

If you are going to use additional .bgl AI traffic, they must be FSX compliant.

UT2 is not AI traffic in the sense that we understand Traffic Database Builder, Traffic Tools or the even better AI Flight Planner. UT2 only loads traffic after the user aircraft is present and fully initialized in FS. You can change aircraft.cfg files entries, change aircraft assignments, adjust routes. Stop and Start UT2 traffic - and see the changes to your AI in your AI world - without shutting down FSX.

UT2 aircraft are placed in the FSX world based on how it reads it's schedule files, determines which aircraft should be where within 120 nm of your aircraft and places them in the world at that point.

Much like the early stages of building a traditional flight plan, but using the abilities we have known about since the FS2004 SDK was released for an external program to create AI traffic with a flight plan for that session only.

There are at least two additional programs which have been out for quite a while which use a similar methodology. Neither tackles as large an AI world as UT2.

Traditional TTools flight plans are more about fleet management than aircraft routing. UT takes each flight leg as itself. A lot we have to unlearn to understand this concept.

QUOTE (Mike_CFII_MEL @ May 28 2009, 09:49 AM)
Just one more question, it showns over 1.3 million general aviation flights, does this mean I'm going to get Cessna's taking off and landing at KJFK and other major airports?. It just looks ridiculous seeing four to seven Cessna's tucked in between airliners. ?


No, GA AI is in broad catagories and the type of airports used is based upon the catagory. The major commercial airports to not get the slow prop aircraft. Even though real Cessna's do land at KJFK almost every day in the special hours they can request a slot. But they do move out quickly after getting that logbook entry.

QUOTE (Mike_CFII_MEL @ May 28 2009, 10:06 AM)
Aside from the Airways and Navaids, does UT 2 use RVSM?.


QUOTE (Jet1 @ May 28 2009, 10:59 AM)
I'm wondering how on earth did they manage to come up with a fairly realistic flightplan for each of those 550000+ flights?? Must have been a helluva manual task or some ingenious data management skills


For both questions - I don't know.

But I do know of two major databases of real world flights and routings. One is FlightAware in the US, another is FSBuild for Flight Simulator. Or UT may have created most routes with the FSX Flight Planner, as I did for an additional airline last night.

The FlightAware and the FSBuild databases will use altitudes which the real world aircraft use - so most likely RVSM - though I would also imagine that the FSBuild database used the alternate North/South RVSM rules used in Europe.

The FSX Flight Planner uses RVSM.

Though I have never seen any of the three alter the altitude for RVSM for individual legs between waypoints such as real world aircraft do.

FlightAware list the maximum altitude of the flight unless you look at the detailed profile of the route actually flown. (By FlightAware, I mean their database of scheduled flights with expected normal flightplan routes between airports, not the actual flight tracking where the routes vary quite a bit based upon weather, traffic delays, etc).

FSBuild is setup for Flight Simulator which is not setup for alternating RVSM altitudes on different legs of the same flights.

UT2 does have a few standard routes across the North Atlantic - which the FSX Flight Planner does not. This does tend to concentrate the across the pond flights into a few narrow corridors, but is one heck of a lot better than the FSX great circle routings.

Alvega escreveu:

Duley escreveu:não me "arrisco" por enquanto.

Risco não tem, porque com a política de devoluções deles, você compra, experimenta, e se não gostar tem 30 dias para devolver e ser reembolsado.

A minha dúvida é em relação a eles dizerem que os aviões AI seguem planos de voo reais (seguindo airways e navaids), o que custa um pouco a acreditar.

Cauan escreveu:Gostaria de experimentar, não gostei muito do MyTraffic, textura e gráficos do avião deixam a desejar ainda mais eu que sou chatíssimo com essas coisas.

willian402m escreveu:

Cauan escreveu:Gostaria de experimentar, não gostei muito do MyTraffic, textura e gráficos do avião deixam a desejar ainda mais eu que sou chatíssimo com essas coisas.

realmente bem isso

Fikou horriveis as texturas

me arrependi!!

Alvega escreveu:

willian402m escreveu:

Cauan escreveu:Gostaria de experimentar, não gostei muito do MyTraffic, textura e gráficos do avião deixam a desejar ainda mais eu que sou chatíssimo com essas coisas.

realmente bem isso

Fikou horriveis as texturas

me arrependi!!

Provavelmente você não tem a última versão.

Alvega escreveu:Alguém já comprou?

Alvega escreveu:E que tal? Vale a pena?

Ricardo Name escreveu:Saiu o 5.2a
Procure na parte de update do seu My Traffic.
Alem disso, patches saem com frequência, tanto em relação a imagem, como em som.
Você está se mantendo atualizado?